Episode 5 with Mark Yates: Measuring sweetness perception to ensure success

Ice cream on a spoon
  • Introduction by Mark Yates
  • The key dimensions of sweetness perception
  • The sensory challenges of alternative sweeteners
  • Predicting success during development
Introduction by Mark Yates
Component content
Mark Yates, Senior Sensory Scientist

Hi, I’m Mark Yates, Senior Sensory Scientist. Today we’ll explore together how sweet science and sensory understanding can be used to build sugar-reduced experiences that consumers love.

   
Here’s what we’ll cover: 
 

  • The sensory drawbacks of alternative sweeteners
  • The key dimensions of sweetness perception
  • Predicting success during development

 

Watch the episode

   

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • subtitles off, selected

        

      Share with a colleague

        

      Explore our insights

      Scroll down or click on the boxes below to jump to the most relevant content.

      The key 
      dimensions of 
      sweetness perception

      Explore

      The sensory 
      challenges of 
      alternative sweeteners

      Explore

      Predicting success 
      during 
      development

      Explore

      The key dimensions of sweetness perception
      Component content

        

      The key dimensions of sweetness perception

      Sucrose is considered the gold standard for sweet taste. It remains the industry’s target profile, with a distinct temporal profile characterised by…

      Immediate
      sweet
      intensity

      Immediate sweet intensity

      Smooth
      rapid
      decline

      Smooth rapid decline

      No delayed
      or lingering
      sensations

      No delayed or lingering sensations

      How do perceptions of sugar alternatives differ to sugar?

      The temporal and taste qualities of sugar alternatives typically differ in a number of ways. These sensations are often not noticed initially but become more apparent as the sweetness fades. Consumers tend to find them undesirable.

      Bitterness
      Liquorice
      Lingering
      Earthy
      The sensory challenges of alternative sweeteners
      Component content

        

      The sensory challenges of alternative sweeteners

      Alternative sweeteners are typically classified in three broad categories.

        

      Synthetic

      Synthetics
      Synthetic

        

      Nutritive natural

      Nutritive natural
      Nutritive natural

        

      Non-nutritive natural

      Plant leaves
      Non-nutritive natural
      Élément
      What is a synthetic sweetener?
      Texte

      Synthetic sweeteners are non-caloric, highly potent compared to sugar and typically exhibit a slower onset of sweetness and slower decay. Primary off-notes are bitterness and sometimes metallic and/or liquorice sensations.

      What is a nutritive natural sweetener?
      Texte

      Nutritive natural sweeteners are caloric and typically have similar or slightly lower sweetness potency than sucrose. Sugar alcohols can mimic the mouthfeel and body of sucrose but also generate a slight cooling sensation. Allulose is a rare sugar with little off-flavours and properties that are particularly useful in bakery for browning. Honey, maple syrup and agave are naturally derived and gaining popularity but are higher in calories and add flavour sensations. 

      What is a non-nutritive natural sweetener?
      Texte

      Non-nutritive natural sweeteners are generally calorie-free, derived from plants, highly potent and some have a slow rise to peak sweetness. Off-notes include bitterness, astringency, licorice off-notes and lingering sweetness. When used at lower levels in blends that are enjoying success.

        

        

      Techniques for measuring sweetness perception

      Here are some of the techniques that we use to measure the intensity and quality differences among alternative sweeteners.

      Temporal dominance of sensations

      Temporal dominance of sensations

      Panellists identify changes in the sweet quality of an experience during consumption duration.

      Quantitative Flavour Profiling (QFP)

      Quantitative Flavour Profiling (QFP)

      This Givaudan proprietary method breaks down sweetness into its individual components and quantifies sweetness in a unified way using Givaudan’s Sense It® language.

        

      Ranking to a reference

      Ranking to a reference

      Panellists rank test samples in the order of most of least similar to a sucrose reference.

      Holistic profiling

      Holistic profiling

      This quantitative sensory tool provides insights into consumers’ overall perception of a new innovation.

       

       

      Temporal dominance of sugar and sweeteners compared


      Sucrose

      Sucrose

      The sweet intensity of sugar is immediate then quickly fades. Other taste qualities exist, but do not impact the overall taste experience.

      Reb A

      Reb A

      ‘Reb A’, a stevia-based natural sweetener, initially tastes moderately sweet but fades sharply, giving way to bitter and liquorice notes.
       

      Thaumatin

      Thaumatin

      Thaumatin, which represents the class of natural sweet proteins, delivers a sweetness that is even more delayed and lingering.

      Analysing the data

      Here are two examples of data analysis techniques performed on Quantitative Flavour Profiling (QFP) and ranking to a reference.

      PCA mapping

      Principal Component Analysis Map (PCA)

      Visually maps the main similarities and differences between sweeteners and sucrose and identifies the main sensory attributes responsible for those similarities and differences.

      R-index analysis

      This defines the degree of difference between two samples, allowing us to identify formulations that are closest to sucrose in overall perception. We can overlay the R-index analysis with sensory profiling data to demonstrate the progressive restoring of a full sugar experience. 

      Sucrose perception
      Predicting success during development
      Component content

        

      Predicting success during development

      Descriptive analysis alone may not be sufficient to predict how consumers will react to a food or beverage. Holistic profiling was developed to tackle this challenge. Panellists rate five attributes independently.

      Impact

      Impact

      The consumers’ first impression of the product.

      Complexity

      Complexity

      The existence of multiple sensory layers.

      Balance

      Balance

      The extent to which the sensory notes are at complementary intensities.

      Integration

      Integration

      The extent to which the sensory notes are at complementary intensities.

      “The overall holistic rating has been strongly correlated to consumer liking and preference. As a tool, it can help companies predict their innovation’s success during product development. Givaudan uses the approach to ‘quantify’ the holistic qualities of sucrose – and then helps food and beverage companies to find solutions to improve the taste of alternative sweeteners by using flavours to rebuild the full taste experience that consumers love in their sugar-reduced foods and beverages.”

      Mark Yates, Senior Sensory Scientist

      02/05/2025